Loading facility information
Loading facility information
Source: CMS · Released July 15, 2026
Every treatment needs a way into the bloodstream. A fistula is a connection made surgically in the arm. A catheter is a tube placed in a large vein. Fistulas last longer and get infected less, so they are generally preferred where a patient's veins allow one.
| Distance | Clinic | Also offers |
|---|---|---|
| 0.0 mi | DaVita Rancho Cucamonga Home Training8219 Rochester Avenue, Ste. 120, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 | Home Hemodialysis · Peritoneal (PD) |
| 0.8 mi | Rancho Dialysis Center Inc7777 Milliken Ave, Suite 100, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 | — |
| 2.0 mi | FMC Dialysis Services Rancho Cucamonga10532 Acacia Street, Suite B2-B3, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 | Home Hemodialysis · Peritoneal (PD) |
| 3.5 mi | USRC Ontario2850 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite C, Ontario, CA 91764 | — |
Yes. This clinic trains patients for home hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Training is a series of visits rather than a permanent move, and your nephrologist has to agree it suits you.
Yes — Medicare records chairs available after 5pm. Which specific times are free changes constantly and is published nowhere, so call to ask.
2 stations, meaning up to 2 people can be treated at once. A larger unit usually means more shift options. It says nothing about the quality of care.
Yes. Medicare places this clinic in the bottom 12% of US clinics. That is a position in a national distribution, not a score it passed or failed — most clinics sit in the middle band by design.
It is a for-profit facility, Medicare-certified since 2010.
By calling. Chair availability, insurance acceptance and wait times are not published by Medicare, or by anyone else, for any clinic in the country. That is why the phone number is at the top of this page.
Every measure Medicare publishes about a dialysis facility, grouped in Medicare's nine categories and numbered for citation. Nothing here is selected. Where this clinic has no figure, the cell carries a dash and Medicare's code, and the codes are explained below the table.
| № | Measure | Patients | Clinic | US | CA | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anemia management | ||||||
| 01 | Medicare patients with hemoglobin < 10 g/dL | 56 | 48% | 21% | 18% | |
| 02 | Medicare patients with hemoglobin > 12 g/dL | |||||
This facility is one of 12 California clinics rated worse than expected. The state has 656. Based on 190 patients.
Based on 190 patients.
These two do not add up to 100%. Some patients use a graft or another form of access. Access type depends on a patient's own veins, whether earlier attempts held, how soon surgery was available, and what the patient chose.
A ratio below 1 means fewer infections than Medicare expected for this clinic's patients. The published range is wide enough here to include the national expectation, which is why Medicare rates it as expected.
This facility is one of 506 California clinics rated as expected. The state has 577. Based on 24 patients.
This facility is one of 575 California clinics rated as expected. The state has 726. Based on 51 patients.
Listing depends on a patient's own health, what the regional transplant centre requires, and the patient's own choice — not on the clinic alone.
This facility is one of 672 California clinics rated as expected. The state has 701. Based on 175 discharges.
This facility is one of 660 California clinics rated as expected. The state has 691. Based on 141 discharges.
This facility is one of 12 California clinics rated worse than expected. The state has 706. Based on 431 patients.
This facility is one of 694 California clinics rated as expected. The state has 716. Based on 130 patients.
This facility is one of 640 California clinics rated as expected. The state has 690. Based on 61 patients.
These are adjusted for how sick a clinic's patients are. For a clinic this size the published ranges are usually wide enough that the figure cannot be told apart from the national expectation.
This facility is one of 23 California clinics rated worse than expected. The state has 605. Based on 49 patients.
Based on 56 patients.
| 5.0 mi | DaVita Upland Dialysis600 N. 13th Avenue, Upland, CA 91786 | Home Hemodialysis · Peritoneal (PD) |
|---|
| 56 |
| 0% |
| 1% |
| 1% |
| Dialysis adequacy | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03 | Adult hemodialysis patients with Kt/V ≥ 1.2 | 200 | 74% | 97% | 96% | |
| 04 | Adult peritoneal dialysis patients with Kt/V ≥ 1.7 | 33 | 46% | 92% | 89% | |
| 05 | Pediatric hemodialysis patients with Kt/V ≥ 1.2 | No figure published. Reason code 259. | 87% | 60% | ||
| 06 | Pediatric peritoneal dialysis patients with Kt/V ≥ 1.8 | No figure published. Reason code 259. | 78% | 72% | ||
| 07 | Pediatric hemodialysis patients with nPCR measured | No figure published. Reason code 259. | 91% | 74% | ||
| Infection | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08 | Standardized bloodstream infection ratio | No figure published. Reason code 201. | ||||
| Mineral metabolism | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09 | Adult patients with hypercalcemia (calcium > 10.2 mg/dL) | 236 | 27% | 1% | 1% | |
| 10 | Adult serum phosphorus less than 3.5 mg/dL | 255 | 17% | 7% | 7% | |
| 11 | Adult serum phosphorus between 3.5-4.5 mg/dL | 255 | 28% | 22% | 22% | |
| 12 | Adult serum phosphorus between 4.6-5.5 mg/dL | 255 | 25% | 27% | 27% | |
| 13 | Adult serum phosphorus between 5.6-7.0 mg/dL | 255 | 22% | 26% | 26% | |
| 14 | Adult serum phosphorus greater than 7.0 mg/dL | 255 | 8% | 18% | 18% | |
| Patient experience | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | Nephrologists' communication and caring (stars, 1–5) | No figure published. Reason code 102. | ||||
| 16 | Quality of dialysis center care and operations (stars, 1–5) | No figure published. Reason code 102. | ||||
| 17 | Providing information to patients (stars, 1–5) | No figure published. Reason code 102. | ||||
| 18 | Patients' rating of the nephrologist (stars, 1–5) | No figure published. Reason code 102. | ||||
| 19 | Patients' rating of the dialysis center staff (stars, 1–5) | No figure published. Reason code 102. | ||||
| 20 | Patients' rating of the dialysis facility (stars, 1–5) | No figure published. Reason code 102. | ||||
| 21 | Survey response rate | No figure published. Reason code 102. | 24% | 25% | ||
| Staff vaccination | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | Healthcare personnel COVID-19 vaccination rate | No figure published. Reason code 201. | 4% | 4% | ||
| Survival & hospitalization | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | Mortality rate (per 100 patient-years) | 431 | 33.8 | 22.2 | Worse than Expected | |
| 24 | Hospitalization rate (admissions) (per 100 patient-years) | 130 | 170.1 | 148 | As Expected | |
| 25 | Readmission rate | 175 | 33.9% | 27.2% | As Expected | |
| 26 | Transfusion rate (per 100 patient-years) | 49 | 112.6 | 32.5 | Worse than Expected | |
| 27 | Standardized emergency department visit ratio | 61 | 0.66 | 0.99 | As Expected | |
| 28 | ED visits within 30 days of hospital discharge (ratio) | 141 | 0.54 | 1.04 | As Expected | |
| 29 | Standardized modality switch ratio | 81 | 5.51 | 1 | Better than Expected | |
| Transplant access | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | First-year kidney transplant waitlist ratio | 24 | 0 | 1 | As Expected | |
| 31 | Prevalent patients waitlisted for transplant | 51 | 25.4% | 16.5% | As Expected | |
| Vascular access | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32 | Adult patients with an arteriovenous fistula | 190 | 36.7% | 57.1% | Worse than Expected | |
| 33 | Adult patients with a catheter in use 90+ days | 190 | 53% | 19% | 17% | |